From Lostpedia
· User Talk Archive up to 14/09/2006 · User Talk Archive from 15/09/2006 - 20/11/2006 · User Talk Archive from 21/11/2006 - 12/02/2007 · User talk Archive from 12/02/2007 - 10/02/2008 · User Talk Archive from 11/02/2008 - 06/03/2009
User Talk Below
Transcript credits
I was under the impression that the reason for the transcript credits is the following language in the transcript banner template: "Please note that many episode scripts for earlier Lost seasons were transcribed by Lost-TV member Spooky with aid of DVR, and at times, closed captions for clarification. She and Lost-TV have generously granted us permission to share/host these transcripts at Lostpedia for the betterment of fans. Unless otherwise stated below, she created this transcript." Please advise as to whether we are doing transcript credits or not. Robert K S (talk) 17:05, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- What is the last Spooky date? How is the revised template banner to read? Is there a place where this was being discussed? Robert K S (talk) 17:15, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I made some corrections and clarifications to the template. Check it out and see if you approve. Robert K S (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- That looks good. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 17:26, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- I made some corrections and clarifications to the template. Check it out and see if you approve. Robert K S (talk) 17:20, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
Canon Ruling
Can you look at Talk:Hydra_Island_camp#Runway and offer some insight please? Thank you. –DocH– my edits
- - Please revisit this at User_talk:Admin#CANON_Discussion and associated links. –DocH– my edits
(New page: @disabled)
Thank you :P --Blueeagleislander 11:49, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
Pairings edit?
Paul - I just discovered your Jan 2 edit on Pairings eliminating non-canonical relationships. Was there any discussion of this anywhere, or was it just your decision? I personally think it was fine content to have, clearly marked as fanon, and is consistent with how LP deals with fanon elsewhere. Or at least a new page like Pairings (fanon) should be created to replace it. I don't want to start an edit war, but would like to see some of that content restored more fully. Thanks! --Jajasoon 15:54, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Feeding Frenzy
Greetings,
Every time I click on the "To see all changes to this page since your last visit, click here:" line in an email for He's Our You/Theories the data at the top of the right column reads (centering removed):
- Current revision (18:24, 26 March 2009) (edit) (undo)
- Mattw1027 (Talk | contribs)
- (→Ann Arbor, MI)
Since today is the 30th, that entry is obviously not true. Clicking on the history tab brings up the correct data. Previously, for other pages, a fix had been to delete the page and restore it (with its history, I think). Could you give that a try?.
Thanks,
--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 13:07, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fixed, I think. Robert K S tell me 20:35, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Ru-Lostpedia users
Dear LostpediaAdmin,
We Ru-Lostpedia users would like to nominate our own administrator who will be able to react quickly to emerging problems. We ask to answer, who has the right to nominate new administrator that is required for appointment and who can become the administrator. With impatience we look forward to hearing. Kind regards, Kuzura, Faraday(, CarrieWhite, Leoyan.
User talk: Kuzura for Ru-Lostpedia. User talk: CarrieWhite for Ru-Lostpedia.
P. S. We request to give administrator rights to Kuzura.
Thanks for congratulations
DPL: Update?
A little under a year ago, I mentioned DPL here, namely the fact that it didnt exist. You replied that you were playing with it and thought that we should be using it. Any verdict on the experiment and whether it is now being used here? -- SacValleyDweller talk contribs 06:35, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Looks like your autosig isn't working
Because your whole sig code is appearing. Maybe check your prefs and make sure the field says autosig and not sig? Robert K S tell me 17:29, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
Forum maintenance
Is it new user reg related? --Blueeagleislander 09:08, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
My page says im still banned plz take it off my ban is expired
--The Kahana 22:38, 14 May 2009 (UTC)The Kahana
The Incident
Sorry, but it contained flashbacks from multiple people (including Jacob), not all of which even feature Jacob (Juliet's). Flashback=centric, hence it's multicentric, despite Jacob's prominent role. --Golden Monkey 11:55, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
come on!! Im 11 and u are treating me like $#%@!!! Get the thing that says im banned on my page!!!! my ban is expired!!! answer me !!!!--The Kahana 19:40, 15 May 2009 (UTC) The Kahana
Tito discussion
Could you please contribute to the Tito Reyes rename discussion? In earlier posts you insinuated that you have evidence toward whether or not Tito was Carmen or David's father, and that would quickly resolve this discussion. -- Sam McPherson T C E 18:05, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
Revisiting episode titles ban + Old spoilers discussion
Hello. So, a while back, there was a decision made to ban all episode titles from the wiki with the exception of the immediately upcoming title. As far as I can tell, this decision was made in the topic Lostpedia talk:Spoiler Policy/Archive 02#Titles are spoilers! (redux) and was made because there was no way to create a collapsible Nav template for the episodes. As you may have seen, users were recently able to create such a template. As such, the original justification no longer applies, so I've reoppened the discussion here. If it's not too much trouble, I would like to get all the SysOps to weigh in on this publicly, as I feel previous spoiler policy discussions have been ignored and/or avoided by SysOps from time to time (particularly [[this one where there was a user consensus to set aside a page for officially released content from the producers, similar to the old "/Spoilers" pages, but used only for official content, which was never heard about again, despite a 100% consensus in the discussion.) At any rate, it would be great to have you all weigh in since I think this is an extremely important issue for Lostpedia that we have resolved, given the original reasoning behind it. Thanks. Jimbo the Tubby talk contributions 07:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought that's what I had done. Is the only difference between a proposal and what I did the fact that yours says "proposal" in it? I'm slightly confused. Jimbo the Tubby talk contributions 18:19, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
goddess
I noticed your revert after I went back and restored all the little fixes over on the statue article. "Goddess" isn't a capitalized word; neither is "god", except when it's used as a name, as Judeo-Christians do. (Usage of the word "god" as an appellative is an artifact of the name of God having become taboo.) Robert K S tell me 06:36, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
Edit war bot
I have posed an Idea for a bot to detect and flag edit wars. The discussion can be found on the Idea page. Blue Eagle Islander suggested I talk to you about making the bot. (I don't know how to make one.) I have a process that can be turned into a bot. Thank you for your help. cgmv123TalkContribsNew Spoiler Policy! 14:55, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism
There's a serial vandal here:
http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Pope_Hayley_C._Retard
Trying to revert the edits in the meantime.-- c blacxthornE t 17:08, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
Rollback
You were having a vandal who made over 500 edits in the space of 70 minutes. It is possible that he will be back [1]. Sannse and I came in to help because we were alerted via chat, but it would have been better if your editors could have handled it by themselves. For this, they need rollback rights. This is basically a faster version of "undo", and it should only be used for vandal fighting. Other than that, it grants no extra powers, and it can be given out freely to anyone whom you trust to not be a vandal. Read more at Help:User access levels, and we've written a detailed explanation of how it works over at w:c:guildwars:GuildWiki:Rollback. --◄mendel► 11:27, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
New Spoiler Policy
I have created a new spolier/promotional material policy that I feel correctly addreses the issues at hand: titles, ignored discussions, and the fact that our motivation is contradictory to our policy. The policy is in two parts. The first part deals with spoilers and can be found here. The second part deals with promotional material and may be found here. I would like you to weigh in so improvements may be made before I submit it to be an official policy. Thanks! cgmv123TalkContribsNew Spoiler Policy! 17:18, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
SysOp opinion
I don't know whether this has already been discussed, but could you and the other SysOps please weigh in on this? Thanks. Jimbo the Tubby talk contributions 21:21, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
Fan Fiction Contest
During the hiatus the theme has been fan appreciation. And I thought what better way than to have a fan fiction contest. And what better place to have it then on lostpedia! There would be rules and challenges each week or two. We would write 18 episodes each has to be with in the same story arc Ben can't die one episode and then come back to life the next one. I really need an admin to support me on this idea and all the feed back I have gotten is positive. Please help! --BenKilledDharma 00:25, 23 August 2009 (UTC) mrb0605@gmail.com
