Wikia

Lostpedia

Mhtmghnd

485 Edits since joining this wiki
August 23, 2009

Contents

Welcome

Hi, welcome to Lostpedia! Thanks for your edit to the Talk:Character appearances page.

Please familiarize yourself with the Spoiler Policy. Spoilers are NOT permitted on the wiki, including community blogs. Any spoilers on the wiki regarding Season 6 will result in an instant and permanent ban. If you wish to read or discuss spoilers please visit our Spoiler Discussion Forum. (Please be aware that this message is automated, and does not mean we believe you are posting spoiler material)

When you post messages to talk pages, please remember to sign your remarks by typing four tildes (~~~~) or by using the Button sig button on the edit toolbar.

If you need help, please check Lostpedia:Help or reach out to a Sysop. Thanks! -- Lostpedia-Welcome (Talk) 02:17, January 7, 2010

Lockes fb

Ok, how on earth is Lockes Fb @ 20:03 of part 2? Im not trying to be rude but you really need to rewatch the episode, the fb starts @ 36:36 which is the 1st half. Not only that but Sun and Jins fb even comes after Lockes and is still in part 1. Im not trying to be sarcastic but are you watching the right episode? -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  22:55, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

I have watched it several times and it is definately where I said it was. That said I now suspect that the episodes have been edited since original airing as I have only seen them on the region 4 DVDs. Clearly somebody else thought the same as me as well as it was only after they made the edit that I went to double check. If what you have been watching was a recording of the original airing then I will accept that as gospel, but I can gurantee you that on my DVDs it is the final flashback and is half way through part 2.Mhtmghnd 01:42, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Huh thats wierd, but yeah it must be something about your dvds region because it was originally shown on abc w/ lockes fb in part 1 (i checked my dvr recording), my dvd has it in part 1 and so does abc.com. I even went to the time 20:03 of part 2 and its jack saying see you in Los Angeles to james. Thats really strange that they would edit an episode that much. Ayways we go by how it was orignally aired here in the states so it is in part 1 im 100% sure. Just curious though where are you from and can you give me an order of fbs. (I just find it really wierd that they would change an episode that much and was wondering why) -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  04:20, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Nevermind I just looked here [[1]] and it explains things. Still that kind of pisses me off, some people may never see it as it was originally shown why would they remove lines from the episode and change the order of scenes. -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  04:26, February 13, 2010 (UTC)
Very weird indeed. I'm glad we got that sorted (and thanks for the link on the dvd page). Maybe we should just put a hidden comment in the appearances so that future editors don't make the same mistage Rachel P and I did. It is nice to know we are all watching the same show isn't it? By the way can you check on your version (the proper one) the other changes made at the same time to see if they are right or not (Roger being in part 1 not 2 and Frank and Bram having no lines in part 2). I just want to make sure that you didn't just change them back too because it was all part of the same edit without actually checking that too. Thanks. Mhtmghnd 00:43, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
Oh and to answer your question I am Australian. Mhtmghnd 00:45, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
I believe everything is right Ill be rewatching it again before 6x04 so ill keep an eye out for anything. -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  01:02, February 14, 2010 (UTC)

Appearances

You've been making some interesting changes to appearance counts. If I'm reading your work correctly, you're counting appearances of Flash-Sideways characters as appearances of Original-timeline characters. Mikhail Bakunin is an example. Can you explain this for me? Thanks.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 13:37, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Also why did you add lapidus appearing in archive footage for 5x01, this does not happen, you may be thinking of Suns fb of Jin "dying" this happens in 5x02 which he already shows up in the fb @ the begining. So no 5x01. -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  15:52, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

Frank first. I saw him on the helicopter as they replayed the seconds immediately before the first time jump. Now for the fs stuff. I included them as it is very confusing having one total in the character appearancees page and another on the character page. Numerous characters already have this (especially leads like Miles etc who are watched more closely than the minor characters which is where I made most of the changes) and I was merely streamlining the site so we don't have different rules on one character than on another. Besides recent episodes have proven that they are infact the same character. I would be sort of okay if none had fs already but the half half nature of the site was unacceptable. Mhtmghnd 04:52, April 25, 2010 (UTC)

Just watched it yeah you are right, in the future add what you told me in the edit summaries so we can avoid the confusion. Btw I agree with you on the whole fs app, half the characters have them counted and half dont, its a mess and a joke the way it is. -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  14:40, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
I would have but I made a few changes at once and there wasn't room to explain them all. I did at least say it was archive footage. Mhtmghnd 07:16, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

mib appeared in EIGHT S1 Eps

Stop changing MIBs appearances he appeared in 8 season 1 episodes not 7. I dont care what the appearance pg says its wrong he appears in 8. eps 1,4,5,6,13,23,24,25. Thats 8 not 7. The appearance pg lists him as not appearing in 24 well its wrong in the original airing 24 and 25 are one the half way point ends when the camera zooms in on lockes face I dont care if ABC.com changed it we go by origninal airing so its wrong. Some moron decided to remove an appearance without any justification or reasoning [[2]] You wanna fix something fix that. -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  14:32, May 18, 2010 (UTC)

I will happily fix that now that I know why you keep changing it. I was going off the only info I had, which was an appearances table that perfectly matched my DVDs. Can you give me a little more info, camera on Locke's face doesn't narrow it down alot for me. Is Adam Black (my talk page, I'll call him what I want (0: ) just heard in 24 or is he actually seen as smokey at that point). If I'm gonna add that appearance I want to get it right. Of course if you'd just fixed it yourself in the first place you wouldn't have to go off at me for not knowing the original was different and not even knowing which episode was left out. Mhtmghnd 04:38, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
I used to put in a lot of time and effort on the character appearances pg, but recently IMO its become a complete joke becaue a lot of morons like to remove/change info and ignore consensus, and some of the recent voted on changes i dont agree with so i just dont edit or look at it. Anyway the split is when the Smoke monsters pov is the camera and it is slowly zooming in on lockes face, right after it lifts the tree up. I believe its grey because Jack and Kate see the smoke before this. -- B1G CZYGS  Talk  Contribs  04:36, May 23, 2010 (UTC)

Testing signature

Mhtm ghnd....talk 01:49, June 20, 2010 (UTC)

My signature

Heey thnx for helping me :D I think it worked :D Thnx so much :D --NK-Metaltalkcontributions 10:50, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki