Talk:Rivers
Back to page
IMO we should change the name of this article to "Bodies of Water". User:Hunter61 just put in a legitimate edit , with the pond/spring at the Temple. There are other references of dialogue using the term creek/stream that also don't quite fit as being called a river.- MRMIKE T C E 15:09, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
I think that "Bodies of water" is a little to general of a term - this article should cover rivers/creeks/tributaries/streams/brooks/etc, so I don't really think the spring should be represented by this aritcle. "Rivers" is a term that encompasses other terms too (creeks, streams, etc). -- CTS Talk Contribs 18:06, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Also, rivers are different and should have a separate article from other bodies of water (i.e. the lake, waterfall lagoon, etc.) -- CTS Talk Contribs 18:07, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
Then perhaps the pond/spring should be removed from this article, to maintain the true spirit of the term rivers and pond/spring be highlighted within the Temple...User:CTS your thoughts???- MRMIKE T C E 20:24, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
I've removed the Spring from this article, since it really isn't a river or stream. -- CTS Talk Contribs 20:55, February 7, 2010 (UTC)
I agree but initially I didn't think it applied either, but I didn't want to get into p--- match with User:LOST-Hunter61.- MRMIKE T C E 21:03, February 7, 2010 (UTC)