How did you find this link to the blog though? For all we know, this can be a fake site. The profile of the blogger of the new blog is a dead giveaway. For the original Rachel Blake blog and GadgetGirl's blog, they do not post anything in their profile -- Chatake 15:15, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
It was posted on the Rachel Blake article. I was in a bit of a hurry to get the latest info here, so I didn't have a chance to check the profile. It may be a hoax, but this is the info we have now. --Aero Zeppelin 15:18, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
Its definitely a different profile, should we delete? --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:19, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
Well, before we do, consider: Rachel says her blog was hacked, who's to say THF didn't hack her profile, too? There are so many explanations to consider, so we should wait a day or so to see if the original blog still receives posts. --Aero Zeppelin 15:22, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Agreed, I've put warnings wherever theres mention of this new blog site so we're covered for the time being --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:26, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Alright. Again, we shall wait and see, because if it is a hoax (I'm becoming more and more convinced after reading the comments on the original blog), then the "Real" Rachel should be responding to this very soon. --Aero Zeppelin 15:27, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
One of my main triggers is that profile. Rachel never gives much information about herself. --Kericanfly 15:31, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- The profile has a different page code to previous messgaes made by Rachel in her own comments section, I checked --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:32, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
i asked speaker if this site is real , he answers "nowhere near real" ... Cool Man 0912 15:56, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Speaker's word is good enough for me. Mark it as a hoax. --Aero Zeppelin 16:04, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Sure. I was going to say keep for reference, but reference is not needed here. If we kept all pages concerning hoaxes, we'd be stealing webspace from more deserving pages, like Blond Tailender, or Flann O'Brien. --Aero Zeppelin 16:13, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
So when the real post 09 comes out, are we just gonna go to Rachel Blake Iceland 02 and change the redirect? --Nickb123 (Talk) 16:14, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Should the June_28 clues page be changed as well? -- Chatake 16:32, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
I changed the real Iceland 02 page to reflect the truth, and added an explanation as to why there is a page up for a post that has not yet been made. As well, I changed the June 28 clues page to mention the hoax. Bases covered. --Aero Zeppelin 16:51, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Nicely done, just need the hoax deleted now and a new blog to take the place of your explanation tomorrow. All this trouble! --Nickb123 (Talk) 16:52, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
- Keep Don't we normally keep pages about hoaxes up?--Peephole 17:50, 2 July 2006 (PDT)
Video[]
How do you know this is fake? The thing Talk 17:46, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
Speaker said it. Cool Man 0912 18:09, 28 June 2006 (PDT)
KEEP: It is properly marked as Non-canon[]
And we need every LOST related hoax in our database. --†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 18:36, 16 July 2006 (PDT)