I think it's safe to assume that Radzinsky is a last name, and not a first - so R.G. could not be a reference to Radzinsky

"N, I'll always be with you. R.G." Edit

The fact that "Naomi" is represented by the single initial "N" (assuming that the bracelet was, in fact, intended for her and not something she acquired by other means) and that the other individual involved uses two initials "RG," we can theorize in two directions: a)This was not a romantic attachment. If Naomi goes by "N," only her first name, why would her lover go by first and last name? That's not very intimate. (Would you say something to your spouse/significant other like, "Mary, I will always be with you, John Smith"?) b) "RG" does not signify a first and last name, but a first and middle name, or two first names intended to be used together (like "MJ" for "Mary Jane").

People are different, and show their love in different ways.

They certainly do; my point was that it would be unusual, in a romantic relationship, for one partner to use only a first name while the other uses his/her full name. If there is intimacy there, it is much more likely that both would go by first names only, no?

I moved the discussion here from the theory page. I'm not sure who submitted any of that, so please come sign it. --macosx 12:36, 20 February 2008 (PST)