Talk:Mapinguari (debunked theory)

From Lostpedia

Bigfoot? Not surprised it was rejected. Granted I did picture it a mechanical dinosaur thingie myself after the pilot, but it was back when i thought Lost was "just another stupid tv-show". --skks 09:53, 29 April 2006 (PDT)

I don't think this should be classified as "unsolved". It's just one of the easter eggs that the creators put in for fun :-) --Jambalaya 15:08, 29 April 2006 (PDT)

Well, it will remain unsolved until we know for once and for all what the monster is. It is very unlikely that it will be a mapinguari, but who knows? maybe they are playing mindfuck with us!. †††GodEmperorOfHell††† --15:36, 29 April 2006 (PDT)

When I first saw this I thought it was real; but the subsequent leaked pages got more and more ludicrous (Jack's twin, Zombie Vincent) and its quite extremely obvious in retrospect that this is nothing but a joke.--Piscez 06:12, 11 August 2006 (PDT)

rename

Rename, it's listed under debunked theories, and like every other one listed there it should have a title that states that it is a Debunked theory.  Orhan94  Talk  Contribs  16:36, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

No, I think that is not a page about a theory, but from an animal that somehow was connected with Lost. And for this reason I think it should continue as Mapinguari. -- Lucas Benicá | Talk | Email | 01:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

• If you are going to argue that this page isn't about a theory, you'll need to remove this ("Mapinguari is a possibly-rejected explanation of what the monster really is.") comment, and the section about The Monster. Unless that is done, I agree that it should be listed as a debunked theory. - NEVERGIVEUP  Contribs  Talk  17:41, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• , it's a theory, nothing more. --LOST-Hunter61 19:33, 11 July 2009 (UTC)