Please do not remove this article for the following reason:

• We know that the producers don't include things for random. This person probably has some sort of meaning, even if a minor one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lilduff90 (talk • contribs) .

Identity Edit

• My theory? JACOB. Ya never know! =P --Mistertrouble189 19:39, 28 July 2008 (PDT)

Delete Edit

Seriously...not important AT ALL. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  E  20:22, 8 August 2008 (PDT)

Keep: he is a character that appeared in both the Barracks video and Orchid Orientation film outtakes , so he has appeared more than Opal, Casey, Dharma Rep 1, etc (even though he doesn't talk or has an identified name). He isn't any less important than Dharma Rep. 1 or other breifly-seen Dharma workers. -- CTS  Talk   Contribs 21:17, 8 August 2008 (PDT)

• Keep due to multiple appearances, even though he is uncredited. --Blueeagleislander 21:39, 8 August 2008 (PDT)
• Keep Hes had more than one show and probably not but may have some importance conoreff
  • First of all - minor credited characters, such as Dharma Rep. 1 are always to be considered of more importance than minor uncredited characters. simply because we know they are there for a reason - uncredited characters (especially those with no lines) might just be props.
  • Secondly - has the man (how do we know its not a woman, btw?) really made two appearances, or is it just the same clip being used twice? If the latter is true, there absolutely are no reason what so ever to keep this article.
  • And last - there is nothing in this article that can't be said in the articles about the two videos the characters are seen in. It might be that the character will have some importance in the show, but to make such a claim at the moment (which we do by giving him an article) is just speculation, which we all know belongs to Lostpedia's theory pages.
  • To sum it up - Speed delete Pierre80 04:09, 9 August 2008 (PDT)

"Uncredited characters (especially those with no lines) might just be props." He is definitely there for a reason, if they went out of their way to film him just for that splitsecond. --Blueeagleislander 04:20, 9 August 2008 (PDT)

I would say delete, but if there is reasonable grounds of mystery and notability to the individual, then a keep it is. --Nickb123 (Talk) 07:39, 11 August 2008 (PDT)

Namaste Edit

The camera focused on him a bit before turning to Pierre in the welcome video when Jack and crew watched it. Significant?--Mistertrouble189 03:59, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

• I think he is meant to demonstrate the idyllic (hippie) lifestyle at the Dharma Barracks. But it's been shown again and again, so it's either somewhat significant or a fun in-joke. Either is notable! --Sfoskett 22:39, 19 March 2009 (UTC)