Talk:Man of Science, Man of Faith
From Lostpedia
I moved the line about Isaac of Uluru being in the hospital from Trivia to Theories because it's by no means definite. Come to think of it, do we need a Trivia section at all here? The fact that it was Adam Rutherford in the other car is already mentioned in the main text.
- Who is Ivana Michele Smith's character? N.D.? -- Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯ Talk 12:05, 12 September 2006 (PDT)
- She was one of the other 48. I wonder if that scene will be included in the S3 Nikki/Paulo episode with Nikki replacing the actress? That would be cool.Jeff 16:56, 20 March 2007 (PDT)
How come we cant have a YouTube vid on there? Copyrights?DeGroot 12:31, 12 December 2006 (PST)
Contents |
Adam Rutherford
Should we even say here that Adam Rutherford is Shannon's father? Since that's not confirmed until Abandoned, isn't that a spoiler to casual fans or those just discovering the show? To be fair, I understand that this is a synopisis of a 18-month old TV episode. Anyway, thoughts? Jeff 16:53, 20 March 2007 (PDT)
It should be said because all of LostPedia is essentially a huge spoiler for "casual fans or those just discovering the show." If one comes to LostPedia, they should be expecting to have things revealed to them that they may not know (which it says on the front page). It is valid information for us, and for those that it is revealed to, then oh well, they were warned.
Locke's boots.
Why did Locke take his boots off?
Shhh
This was the first thing Walt told Shannon but is not mentioned on this article... Don't you think it bears some relevance? He also said it in Abandoned, right before Shannon was shot. If anything, it should be mentioned as a foreshadowing warning to her death. Had she been quite, she'd be alive. Or is it too far fetched? --AlexAx 11:38, 9 July 2007 (PDT)
Blooper?
Someone added "While Charlie is telling some survivors that nobody is coming to get them, one of the survivors looks briefly to the camera."
I've look for this and can't find it. Anyone have a screencap?--Anfield Fox|talk|contributions 06:50, 5 June 2009 (UTC)
Lord of the Flies?
I think the Lord of the Flies bit under the Cultural References section should be taken out. The episode itself never explicitly makes this reference so it's mere cool coincidence at best. Kind of like a paper topic, but doesn't really belong there. There are a lot of these kinds of things. Woodandiron 03:01, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Desmond FB?
Eh!? How is this a Desmond FB? I removed it. I've never heard it's called a FB...unlike Juliet's (where it was clearly a flashback, since it's long ago), this picks up around the same time as Exodus' ending. It's just another perspective on the present action...like how Adrift shows us the same time in the Hatch, but now from Kate and Locke's perspective. That is not considered a Kate and Locke FB by anyone so this should not be listed as a Desmond FB and a Jack FB. And if you decide to persist and make this a Desmond FB, then I'll just go ahead and make every episode with action taking place at the same time as a earlier one a flashback, since evidently you won't mind. :)--Golden Monkey 17:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- For me, this one could go either way ... We see Desmond doing lots of things in the hatch ... Things that take time (such a showering) and THEN it goes to the last shot of season 1, making it a flashback (of a few minutes / hours) ... And it's the beginning of a season premiere, which, traditionally has nearly always been a flash. Adrift is *clearly* not the same thing ... but I won't debate this any further, since, in the end, I don't really care either way in this particular case. --LeoChris 21:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- LeoChris just made all my points for me. Furthermore, many people consider the opening of "This Place Is Death" to be a Sun-flashback, which I consider debatable because it shows the same events at the last season of the episode (not different events, as in this episode). But if that one could be considered a flashback, then certainly this one is. But either way, this episode contains a Desmond flashback in the exact same way that "A Tale of Two Cities" contains a Juliet flashback or "The Beginning of the End" contains a Hurley flashforward. Jimbo the Tubby talk contributions 01:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Washing machine
Hasn't anyone reflected about that the washing machines that are visible in the Swan station looks a bit newer than the rest of the interior. They look more like a modern type of washing machine and not something from the 70's. So is this something that should fit in under "Bloopers and continuity errors"? / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 20:59, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- Doesn't Hurley actually mention this in the episode where he's doing laundry with Rose? Jimbo the Tubby talk contributions 22:14, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
- I believe it's actually mentioned in another episode (Dave ?) I'm pretty sure the scene involves Hurley and Libby. --LeoChris 00:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok... I don't remember that, but I'll look for it when I rewatch those episodes... / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 07:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- I just made a search here at Lostpedia and found out that the episode mentioned are Fire + Water (Under the general section). When Hurley and Libby are doing laundry in the Hatch, Libby wonders if the washer and dryer are newer than anything else in the hatch. / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 07:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok... I don't remember that, but I'll look for it when I rewatch those episodes... / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 07:39, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
- I believe it's actually mentioned in another episode (Dave ?) I'm pretty sure the scene involves Hurley and Libby. --LeoChris 00:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
