Contents 1 Header 2 Discussion: Giving each class its own page 3 9+22+2+0+0+9=42! 4 what counts as spoilers?

HeaderEdit

Hey party people - which one do you prefer as a potential header for this article... see the two options I've cooked up at User:Nickb123/sandbox2. Thanks, --Nickb123 (Talk) 17:22, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

- option #2.  ODK  Talk  Sandbox  17:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I vote on the bottom one (I assume that's option 2). - NEVERGIVEUP  Contribs  Talk  17:41, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I vote for a hybrid version, I like the picture on the right, but I want the top banner to span the whole header. cgmv123TalkContribsE-mail 20:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

I was just following convention for the TLE, F815 and Project headers. If it was followed strictly, option 1 should be used... but I just thought 2 might be interesting considering how the template is devised by semester. --Nickb123 (Talk) 20:11, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

- option #2. It's nicer to the eye --LOST-Hunter61 05:11, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

OK guys, for the moment I have added option 2. I understand there is convention, but I think as Lost University is currently, an adapted header separating the two semesters is most appropriate. Thanks for the feedback. --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

• We need to link the articles. Lots of work to be done here, for anyone with the time and know-how.--Mc peko 09:19, 8 August 2009 (UTC)

Discussion: Giving each class its own pageEdit

The way I see it, the classes are currently taking up a lot of room, and when Lost University launches there will be considerable information for each class, along with trivia etc - taking up too much room on this page. Added to this, there'll be info on the logged in screen, points, user league table and other stuff that WILL need to be in this main article. Thus, it makes sense to me to prepare by moving out the lecture material to separate pages. My top of page nav already allows for easy access, and the section in the article can simply be changed to a normal hyperlinked table. --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

We'll need a split soon, yes.--Mc peko 03:24, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

A split will be needed, as long as each coarse is referenced/linked on main page. - NEVERGIVEUP  Contribs  Talk  20:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

This section of Lostpedia is likely to get bigger and bigger, so lets keep it organised early on. Sazzlemajazzle 20:36, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Not yet, but eventually they will need splitting up, probably when classes start. cgmv123TalkContribsE-mail 17:09, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

• knowing Lostpedia's treatment of last years tests and TLE's elements and glyphs it's a sure thing that there will be a lot of analysis that will justify each class' article. --Orhan94 17:28, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Should the need arrive, the top of page nav can be hyperlinked and, for the catalog section on this article, I have a template almost ready to go here (see bottom of page). --Nickb123 (Talk) 23:30, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually can we just separate them now - the article looks really badly cluttered at the moment. --Nickb123 (Talk) 10:49, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Okay, I'll start articles about some of the classes. --Orhan94 21:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Please do. The toc is like a monster.--Mc peko 14:50, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

9+22+2+0+0+9=42! Edit

i just realised something that's probably unimportant. The LU opens up for new registrations on the 22nd of september (the 9th month) 2009. If you do 22+9+2+0+0+9 you get 42! -—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rishim (talk • contribs) .

And why would you use "22" as a single number but the digits in "2009" as individual numbers? Sounds like Apophenia to me. September 22, 2004 was the premiere date of the series pilot. This is just five years later. Your random maths are a coincidence.--Nevermore 12:26, September 8, 2009 (UTC)

Don't mistake coincidence for fate.Wc49 21:14, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

what counts as spoilers? Edit

Its possible (I'm not saying how) to see all the Lost University courses right now. Is information gained by subverting the intent of the online "game" considered a spoiler? Dragline22 02:55, December 10, 2009 (UTC)