Talk:IMDb
Back to page
| Welcome to the talk page for "IMDb" |
|---|
|
This article was previously nominated for deletion and the result was keep. Consider the prior discussions before re-nominating. |
|
See Also: |
Deletion
Edit
Delete this page. Do I have to say why? --Princess Dharma (banned) 16:45, 21 February 2007 (PST)
- Yes, that would be helpful. Also, you should tag articles for deletion using the {{delete}} template. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 18:44, 21 February 2007 (PST)
keep Its a site we reference to on alot of our pages, so I, for one, think it's fitting we give it a page. --lewisg 07:45, 22 February 2007 (PST)
- I thaught it would be pretty obvious why I was putting this page up it has nothing to do with LOST.Princess Dharma (banned)
- Keep All our cast articles are marked with an IMDB link. Anyone unfamiliar with the term might search it on Lostpedia, so a page is helpful --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:09, 23 February 2007 (PST)
Keep No doubt about it --Mr. Crabby (Talk) 11:39, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- Conditional delete - see "Content" section below. Will change to keep if issues are resolved. -- Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯ Talk 14:00, 24 February 2007 (PST)
- Conditional - What Santa said. --Jambalaya 15:05, 24 February 2007 (PST)
Per the comments and discussion above the result is keep. The content mentioned below by Santa was added to the article. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 15:28, 24 February 2007 (PST)
ContentEdit
- The article has no content on how IMDb's content is created. In other words, we need to explain user submissions to IMDb, and how that pertains to previous errors they have made (or still have) with respect to Lost, as well as why Lostpedia does not consider "news" of upcoming episodes as "official". Currently the article is a vanilla description with little relevance to Lost or Lostpedia. If that content is not added, I would agree with deleting this article. -- Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯ Talk 13:58, 24 February 2007 (PST)
