DeleteEdit

Delete This stub article has no information in it that isn't already referenced in the appropriate episode articles. So it either needs deletion, or somebody should have a go at expanding it to give a list of known files and information within them.--TechNic|talk|conts 13:39, 14 May 2007 (PDT)

Abstain: Could be a decent enough article with a bit of work, and it is important for continuity's sake to the story on how the Others know so much about the survivors, but it is a bit of a trivial specific page. Also there isn't much informative stuff to include other than "the Others made some files, that's why they knew so much". --Nickb123 (Talk) 13:43, 14 May 2007 (PDT)

Delete: This page should be deleted but the information should be kept where this should be put into a more relivent page such as the flame page. --Pacific Gilly 1992 09:52, 16 May 2007 (PDT)

Redesign: Rather than lump everything into one nebulous paragraph, perhaps details on the individual files we've seen thus far would be more useful to someone seeking answers? There have been three files of which I'm aware: Jack, Sawyer, and Kate. Perhaps breaking each file out into a section of its own within the article would allow readers to see both the forest and the trees? --ConspiracyofDetails 10:06, 17 May 2007 (PDT)

Complete Re-Write:I think this could be a good candidate for Article Attack. --Mr. Crabby (Talk) 13:05, 25 May 2007 (PDT)

Rewrite I agree with Crabby --Blueeagleislander 17:51, 25 May 2007 (PDT)

• Keep and rewrite: I think this could be an interesting article with more detail. --   Lost Soul   talk  contribs  01:25, 1 June 2007 (PDT)

Rename Edit

--Orhan94 19:22, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Are there any other "files" we have articles about? Article titles should always be the shortest unambiguous name.  Robert K S   tell me  19:26, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well there is only one dog whistle, one wheelchair and one tapestry on the show yet we still named their respective articles Locke's whistle, Locke's wheelchair and Jacob's tapestry. I think that if we are using the "X's Y" pattern for naming articles it should be used on every single article it can be used becuase it simply looks better when they all follow a single pattern IMO. --Orhan94 23:22, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

And that's the problem with a lot of your renaming nominations. You seem to be more concerned with picking up on and following a pattern rather than following a logic.  Robert K S   tell me  00:35, February 8, 2010 (UTC)