Lostpedia
Advertisement

Rename[]

Should be a speedy rename to "Dharma video camerman" to follow other article titles related to the "modern" DHARMA such as Dharma booth video, Dharma correspondence, and Dharma Wants You. -- CTS  Talk   Contribs 18:27, 22 November 2008 (PST)

This is a very tricky one. The video is about the old DHARMA, but it was used by the new Dharma. I really see the rationale for both sides and wouldn't mind either way, so I'm going to Abstain. --Blueeagleislander 23:26, 22 November 2008 (PST)
I can see how it could go either way, but I think we should stay with consistency. The Dharma booth video is spelled the modern way, but this article is spelled the old way. I think either they should both be DHARMA or Dharma. -- CTS  Talk   Contribs 11:24, 26 November 2008 (PST)
I say that it should be Dharma, because the Dharma refers to the Dharma booth, which is modern. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  E  16:31, 26 November 2008 (PST)
  • Agreed for now. However the video itself is from the old DHARMA days, so if it ever shows up in an episode (as the orchid video did), we might revert back to all caps. Not a huge deal, but as we've said, it's for consistency's sake. -- Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯  Talk  16:47, 26 November 2008 (PST)

Unanswered questions[]

I removed the "Is the cameraman Faraday" question as its pointless since the first question is asking who the cameraman is? Why does the same question need to be asked twice?Wild ste 13:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

Merge[]

Who suggested that this should be merged with Daniel Faraday? If they did, no offence, but that is stupid as we have no idea that it is Daniel. Daniel is the most common theory but it might be someone completely different. Until it has been confirmed in an episode, it should stay here as its own artical.Wild ste 11:02, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

  • It's probably 100% correct BUT we have no proof for it yet, so yah, it shouldn't be merged yet. However, if the general speculation is correct about this week's episode, then we'll know if this is Faraday by then. --Crash815 Talk 02:27, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
    • Okay, so (after watching "The Variable") either this video isn't 100% canon or the cameraman isn't Faraday. --Crash815 Talk 02:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
      • A recent interview says that the video is now a continuity error. So, it seems fairly non-canon now, doesn't it. --Gibbeynator 17:40, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Follow-up actions[]

So, we now know it is Faraday but this video is NOT canon. So we can either merge is with Faraday's page, and list it under the trivia section, or delete this article completly. What do you say? Merge or delete?  ODK  Talk  Sandbox  20:45, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

  • The most logical thing to do is merge the information and put it under trivia on Faraday's page. --Crash815 Talk 21:40, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Advertisement