RenameEdit

Agree: obvious reasoning. --Nickb123 (Talk) 06:23, 6 August 2008 (PDT)

Agree Old DHARMA (as opposed to the new ARG Dharma) was an acronym, so it must be caps. --Blueeagleislander 06:25, 6 August 2008 (PDT)

Done. Robert K S (talk) 06:37, 6 August 2008 (PDT)

• Though I get that Opal was supposted to be Rep. 2, but since she has a name on the site, would it not be more efficient for the article to be named simply DHARMA Rep? I understand that it's casting and all, but still. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  E  06:38, 6 August 2008 (PDT)
  • The only problem I can see there is that "DHARMA Rep" is ambiguous. It can lead to either of these characters, or to others. Robert K S (talk) 06:41, 6 August 2008 (PDT)
    • Even Horace could be seen as a DHARMA Rep, anyone DHARMA could. This is the credited "name" of one specific character. --Blueeagleislander 06:44, 6 August 2008 (PDT)
      • I understand that we use credited names by now, believe me. I just don't think that some of the names that ABC gives these characters are the most descriptive or best for the character. But I'll abide by policy. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  E  06:45, 6 August 2008 (PDT)
        • Yeah, the names are terrible at times. "N.D. Survivor", "Man" etc. But we have to deal with that. --Blueeagleislander 06:47, 6 August 2008 (PDT)
      • I know that we have to. I'm just not sure why. If we can think of a more descriptive and overall better title for a character, could we not rename the character, and then simply state in trivia "In press releases, this character was credited as _______."? It'd seem better to me than having articles titled Young man. -- Sam McPherson  T  C  E  06:51, 6 August 2008 (PDT)