Talk:? (episode)
From Lostpedia
Hi, when I watched the episode, I noticed, especially around the plane and the Pearl, that the music was very different. Does anyone know any more on this, and if it should be commented on in the article? --The Smiley-Faced Balloon 13:11, 13 September 2006 (PDT)
This page
It looks really really cool now with all the pics, so professional. Might have a read through and if the contents as good as the appearence I may reccomend for article of the week. Well done to those who've worked on it--Joe 15:48, 26 November 2006 (PST)
Episode name?
So how exactly are you supposed to say this episode name? Question mark? Unknown? i dunno.
Rename
I noticed thet "?" is a redirect to this page, so why don't rename it? --Kemot from Poland 09:03, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
- I agree. If ? is a redirect, then rename, or turn ? into a disambig page. -- Sam McPherson T C E 09:29, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
::It looks like there have been a disambig page at the "?" page, but it has been changed to a redirect to "? (episode)" instead. / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 12:39, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
- I also noticed that the "?" page earlier served as the article for the episode... for some reason it was moved/renamed to "? (episode)" on 31 juli 2006 kl. 05.44 by user:SilvaStorm. There must have been a reason for that change, so I don't think it's necessarily to change it back. If you think it's necessarily make the "?" page a disambig again. / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 12:48, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
- Oh... hehe... one more comment! ;-) I noticed that the "? (episode)" has an edition at the top of the page to the disambig page ("?" redirects here. For other uses of "?", see: ? (disambiguation))... so no change is necessarily. If someone searches for "?" they most likely are looking for the epsiode... so the redirect is logical. And because there are many articles about question marks this articles name should be "? (episode)"... so I don't think any change is necessarily! Check out ? (disambiguation). / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 13:00, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
- I also noticed that the "?" page earlier served as the article for the episode... for some reason it was moved/renamed to "? (episode)" on 31 juli 2006 kl. 05.44 by user:SilvaStorm. There must have been a reason for that change, so I don't think it's necessarily to change it back. If you think it's necessarily make the "?" page a disambig again. / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 12:48, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
Agree - rename to "?". There is no reason to call it "? (episode)". -- CTS Talk Contribs 18:08, 21 June 2008 (PDT)
- Yeh... since there are that disambig note at the top of the page, and most searches aims for the episode article it would be the best to rename it. / Dreamingtree72 talk contribs 00:26, 22 June 2008 (PDT)
- Rename: since "?" is a redirect to this page and there is no need of the additional "(episode)" because of the ? (disambiguation) page. -- Steff talk contribs email 07:07, 22 June 2008 (PDT)
- Disagree: I think its more that having a proper article with simply the extension URL /wiki/?/ is just a bit impractical and doesn't look good simply having a title that is punctuation. That's why I think the brackets are used. --Nickb123 (Talk) 10:48, 13 July 2008 (PDT)
- Disagree: I agree with Nick. It just looks impractical and odd to just have "?" as the name of the page. --Marik7772003 11:27, 23 July 2008 (PDT)
