Lostpedia talk:No personal attacks
From Lostpedia
Contents |
Necessary?
Do we need a separate policy to further define "No Personal Attacks", beyond the section on Netiquette & Basic Courtesy found in LP:GUG? -BearDog 17:07, 30 January 2007 (PST)
- I feel that due to the behavior of certain members on the site, a more formal policy is needed. A guide is just a guide, while policy is something to be enforced. -- Jabberwock talk contribs email - 18:38, 30 January 2007 (PST)
Rename?
- I agree, I don't like this some users need in no uncertain terms telling. Princess Dharma (banned)
- What does that mean? Jabberwock talk contribs email - 14:08, 11 March 2007 (PDT)
It means that some users could use someone having a go at them. The Captain Insanos of the world are necessary. Princess Dharma (banned)
- That's not your responsibility here. If you are aware of a user that needs "having a go at", then bring that to the attention of a sysop for evaluation and the appropriate disciplinary measures will be taken. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 14:16, 11 March 2007 (PDT)
I believe it should be every users right and responsibility to ensure other users convene to the rules. If a user steps out of line then anybody should be able to tell them what for. Princess Dharma (banned)
- Yes, but in a calm and courteous fashion. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 14:27, 11 March 2007 (PDT)
Why should I be nice to an idiot? Princess Dharma (banned)
- And why should I or Jabr. You are no longer welcome here PD. You've gone too far. -- Plkrtn talk contribs email 14:31, 11 March 2007 (PDT)
I really, really didnt see that one coming. -- Iron Man Send a message View contributions 10:01, 12 March 2007 (PDT)
Talk about Irony. --Mr. Crabby (Talk) 13:13, 15 March 2007 (PDT)
